The Magic Mill 9-tray model earns consistent praise from home preservers who want commercial-style tray count without a commercial price. With nearly 7,000 reviews and a 4.6-star average, buyer satisfaction is genuinely high for this price tier.
Home jerky makers and fruit dryers who want 9 trays of capacity but aren't ready to spend $300 or more on an Excalibur.
Skip if
You need verified wattage and temperature specs before buying, or you want a unit with a published max-temp rating.
Priced 73% above the category median ($115.49 across 38 tracked models)
Pros
9 trays provide generous batch capacity for home use
4.6-star rating across nearly 7,000 reviews signals reliable performance
Mid-range price of $199.99 is accessible compared to premium shelf dehydrators
Stainless steel construction is more durable and easier to clean than plastic
Cons
No wattage, max temperature, or dimensions published, making direct comparison difficult
Buyers who need verified temp specs for food-safety reasons have no data to rely on
Our scorecard
4.6/5overall
Owner rating4.6/5
4.6 average across 6,900 owner ratings
Popularity4.5/5
6,900 owner reviews, more than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other slow cookers, electric pressure and rice cookers, sous vide, food dehydrators, egg cookers, popcorn poppers, and ice cream and shaved ice machines we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
The Magic Mill 9 Trays SS 2 sits at $199.99, placing it squarely in the mid-range of the food dehydrator market. Its appeal is straightforward: nine trays of drying surface gives home users enough room to run a meaningful batch of jerky, apple rings, or herbs in one go, without the higher price tag of Excalibur's comparable shelf units.
Spec data from the listing is sparse, with no published wattage, temperature ceiling, or unit dimensions on record. That makes it harder to compare on paper against rivals that do publish those numbers. Buyers who care about precise temperature control for low-heat raw foods or high-heat jerky should check current listing details before purchasing.
That said, the feedback volume here is substantial. Close to 7,000 buyers have rated this unit, and the 4.6-star average holds across a wide sample. That kind of sustained satisfaction at this price point is a meaningful signal for practical home use.
Performance notes
Published specs for this unit do not include wattage, max temperature, tray count confirmation, or dimensions. Buyers should review the current Amazon listing for any updated spec sheet before purchase.
What buyers say
With 6,900 reviews averaging 4.6 stars, buyer sentiment is strongly positive. This is one of the larger review samples in the mid-price dehydrator category, suggesting consistent real-world satisfaction rather than a spike from a single batch of reviewers.
Similar slow cookers, electric pressure and rice cookers, sous vide, food dehydrators, egg cookers, popcorn poppers, and ice cream and shaved ice machines to consider
How many trays does the Magic Mill 9 Trays SS 2 include?
The model name indicates 9 trays. For current tray dimensions and total drying area, check the product listing directly, as those figures are not in the published spec data we have on record.
Is this unit good for making beef jerky?
Buyers broadly report positive results for jerky, which is one of the most common use cases mentioned in the review pool. However, because no max temperature is published here, confirm the current listing shows a temp high enough for USDA jerky guidelines, typically 160 degrees F or above, before relying on it for meat.
How does the Magic Mill compare to Excalibur at a similar tray count?
Excalibur units at 9 trays typically run $288 or more and publish detailed wattage and temperature specs. The Magic Mill offers a lower entry price and has a large review base, but lacks the published spec transparency that Excalibur provides, which matters if you want to compare performance on paper.
We use necessary cookies to keep the site working. With your permission, we also use functional, analytics, and marketing cookies. Read our Cookie Policy.
